- Broadcom Bcm943460mc Ac Wifi Card For Macbook Pro
- Broadcom Bcm943460mc Ac Wifi Card For Mac Download
- Broadcom Bcm943460mc Ac Wifi Card For Mac Pro
Implements the 3-stream 802.11ac specification to enable speeds up to 1.3 Gb/s in access points, routers, DSL/cable gateways and PC products. The single-chip dual-band transceiver integrates all the major functional blocks needed to implement a complete 802.11ac wireless sub-system, including radio, baseband and Media Access Control (MAC).
Interesting find, the only way to know if it will work is to get one. Apple has made the drivers very narrowly focused. A specific vendor and device id. I was testing these cards out more than a year ago. There is a Lenovo wavefront version with same basic radio that differs by a character or two, invisible to the drivers, unless you mod them. Which now requires kext dev mode.
Look on a board called OSXLATITUDE by Toleda. He used to write the mods to make offbrand cards work, they may have tested this one already. For a little more (potential) rain on the parade, there are many pre-release Apple BCM94360CD cards floating around with a slightly different radio and BT card. They obviously tested several variations. I recently got a box of 30, of which only 3 worked. The other 27 either had wrong BT (ended with A instead of B) or wrong WiFi, or both. Speaking of which, do these cards mention BT?
Most have both. Anyhow, for $30 you might have a working card, at the very least you will have a card that will work with some tweaks.
May even have BT. Lucas, I can guarantee that card isn't going to give you BT in a 4,1 or 5,1. The simple fact is that the slot doesn't contain the USB data lines. Only the 1,1 through 3,1 have those lines present. That is why OSX WiFi has to include a wire that exits through a cheese grater hole and plugs into a USB plug.
We run them internally to the OEM jack, but either way the BT won't work without them. I test all the cards first in a 2006 Mini, which actually has the lines run, Apple originally made the slot adhere to spec but never included BT on the cards. The other thing to be aware of is the images card only has 2 antenae plugs.
AC WiFi requires 3 to give 1300 speed. And that still leaves one to wonder where the BT antenae connects. The Apple cards have 4 antenae connections, no way 2 is going to give you same performance.
(If you look closely there are pads for 3 but only 2 are soldered on) EDIT: reading the ad again I note that they never mention BT. So at least that seems realistic. With the Apple cards 2 antenae versions are limited to 867 speed, looking forward to how these work. They would have to use the specific Apple vendor and device codes, similar to those SSDs that allow Trim. Quite possible they have. Lucas, I can guarantee that card isn't going to give you BT in a 4,1 or 5,1. The simple fact is that the slot doesn't contain the USB data lines.
Only the 1,1 through 3,1 have those lines present. That is why OSX WiFi has to include a wire that exits through a cheese grater hole and plugs into a USB plug. We run them internally to the OEM jack, but either way the BT won't work without them. I test all the cards first in a 2006 Mini, which actually has the lines run, Apple originally made the slot adhere to spec but never included BT on the cards. The other thing to be aware of is the images card only has 2 antenae plugs.
AC WiFi requires 3 to give 1300 speed. And that still leaves one to wonder where the BT antenae connects. The Apple cards have 4 antenae connections, no way 2 is going to give you same performance. (If you look closely there are pads for 3 but only 2 are soldered on) EDIT: reading the ad again I note that they never mention BT. So at least that seems realistic.
With the Apple cards 2 antenae versions are limited to 867 speed, looking forward to how these work. They would have to use the specific Apple vendor and device codes, similar to those SSDs that allow Trim. Quite possible they have.
Click to expand.Yeah i wasn't looking at whether or not it will enable the bt handoff features, just the better AC throughput + range. I've ordered them now, will update when they arrive and ill see what they can do. As i stated before the ad states they are for the mac pro, if they don't work, refund time.
I did notice that the card only has 2 connectors, whereas the first one if the thread has three. It will be interesting to see what comes of these, i wasn't exactly sold with previous methods of adding ac to the mac pro.
I just received the card in the mail. (Shipping was pretty fast from China.) Here is a photo of what I received. It was a straight swap. (Just don't drop the screws in your Mac Pro). Click to expand.Thanks for the update. So the good, it works.
Broadcom Bcm943460mc Ac Wifi Card For Macbook Pro
The Bad, It only comes with 2 antenna slots. I can't see this working any faster than 867mbps because of this, but i guess their is only one way to test. My iMac has the 3 antenna version and i always connect at 1300, but I'm only 10 feet from my router.
Broadcom Bcm943460mc Ac Wifi Card For Mac Download
How far is your mac pro from your router? Could you move the mac pro near the router to test and see the highest speed you can achieve? A simpler method would be to move your router near your mac if its more complicated to move your mac pro.
You don't need your internet to do this test so just moving the router to check the connection status would be enough. Thanks again for this thread! I'm still considering it haha. Click to expand.Thanks for the update! You should contact the seller and tell him that you received one with two antenna instead of the 3 antenna version you won on eBay. Your card looks just like this one since the guy is in china I doubt he'll ask for a new one if you complain I bet he'll send you the correct one or give a refund. Are better than the other card but still it's not able to get the 1300 that it's claiming and sent you something that was different than the photo.
Broadcom Bcm943460mc Ac Wifi Card For Mac Pro
This one only claims 867mb with two antennas And this one. Since the cMP is not exactly a portable system, I'm guessing people want WIFI in their cMP because it is too far from their router to wire it? A wired connection is ALWAYS preferred to wireless, since wireless is prone to fluctuations, interference and issues with other wireless devices. A suggestion is to use a POWERLINE adapter kit to WIRE your router to your Mac Pro (or any computer) over your home's electrical wiring. I use these frequently for clients, and for a very low cost you get a reliable, fast WIRED connection to your computer. You don't need an expensive kit.something like will get you a fast, wired connection to your computer from your router, regardless of distance away in the house. The technology is mature now and works well.
Since the cMP is not exactly a portable system, I'm guessing people want WIFI in their cMP because it is too far from their router to wire it? A wired connection is ALWAYS preferred to wireless, since wireless is prone to fluctuations, interference and issues with other wireless devices. A suggestion is to use a POWERLINE adapter kit to WIRE your router to your Mac Pro (or any computer) over your home's electrical wiring. I use these frequently for clients, and for a very low cost you get a reliable, fast WIRED connection to your computer.
You don't need an expensive kit.something like will get you a fast, wired connection to your computer from your router, regardless of distance away in the house. The technology is mature now and works well. Click to expand.It's depends a lot on you house and the how its wired up into the breaker system. These are actually slower than wireless 802.11ac I gave this a try before I got my iMac I have a 1gb up and down connection that I can max out when I connect two gigabyte lan cords from my router to my Mac Pro. When I only connect 1 cord I seem to max out around 800mbps. I'm not sure why that's is.
I also have a late 2013 iMac (fully maxed out) with the new AC card inside of it (the apple 3 antennas version) I get a full 1300mbps connection when I'm 20 feet away. Although when I download I maxed out around 650mbps. So I wired up a cord to my 1 gigabyte connection and I still max out at 650-700mbps on my iMac through the cord (20 foot) but with a shorter 10 foot cord I was able to reach 980mbps speed tests (maybe my longer cord is bad) Those adapters run at a max of 500mbps (rated) and they are actually a lot slower since it depends on your houses wiring. I used to use this when I had Comcast a few years ago at my old house and it was rated for 500mbps but I could only connect at 100-200mbps.
I even tried with a very close power socket. If you have internet that is 100mbps or less then yes your method will work just fine. If you have a very fast connection like me you just gimping yourself with that device. My iMac connects at 1300mbps from 20 feet away. This is really good for the distance, but I'm sure their is some packet loss (like all wireless) which is why I can't seem to go over 650mbps on speed tests or when downloading wirelessly.